Alternative to
Lapas vs ProNest LT - which should you use?
ProNest LT is Hypertherm's entry-level CAM and nesting package. If you cut on Hypertherm plasma hardware it does things Lapas cannot. If you do not, you are paying for integration you will never use.
The short answer
Use ProNest LT if you cut on Hypertherm plasma hardware. SureCut, meaning True Hole, Rapid Part and PlateSaver, is tied to their machines and produces hole quality and cut sequencing no generic nester can reproduce, including this one. That is a hardware-level advantage and it is real. Use Lapas if you are not a Hypertherm shop, or you need to work outside Windows, or you want to evaluate on real files without a trial clock running. Lapas has a free plan with no expiry; ProNest LT is $29.99 a month per user after a 7 day trial.
- You are not running Hypertherm plasma hardware
- You work on macOS or Linux, or you want it on a tablet
- You want a free plan rather than a trial with a clock on it
- One person nests occasionally and a per-seat subscription is hard to justify
- You want published benchmark data before you commit budget
- You cut on Hypertherm plasma tables and want SureCut
- True Hole matters: bolt-ready holes without a secondary operation
- You want process parameters tuned to your machine and consumables
- You want trained vendor support and formal training included
- You are already inside the Hypertherm ecosystem and want one supplier
ProNest LT facts checked against hypertherm.com in July 2026.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Lapas | ProNest LT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan, no expiry | ProNest LT is trial then paid | ||
| Entry price | $0 | $29.99/mo | "Smart Start", per user |
| Free trial | Not needed | 7 days | |
| Runs in the browser | ProNest LT is a Windows install | ||
| macOS / Linux / tablet | |||
| DXF import | |||
| True-shape nesting | |||
| Live nesting preview | |||
| Hypertherm SureCut | ProNest LT wins clearly | ||
| True Hole bolt-ready holes | ProNest LT wins clearly | ||
| Machine-specific post processors | ProNest LT wins clearly | ||
| Training & vendor support included | ProNest LT wins clearly | ||
| Published benchmark data | Raw JSON/CSV, CC BY 4.0 |
Where ProNest LT genuinely wins
Worth saying plainly, because most comparison pages will not.
- SureCut is a hardware advantage, not a feature-list item
True Hole, Rapid Part and PlateSaver work because Hypertherm controls the software and the plasma source together. On their machines that means bolt-ready holes without a secondary operation. No third-party nesting tool can reproduce it, and this one does not pretend to.
- Post processors that are known to work
Output validated against specific controllers with vendor support behind it. Lapas exports DXF for you to post yourself, and its G-code export is beta and unvalidated across controllers. If you need proven machine output today, that is a real reason to pay.
- Training and support are in the price
Plans include support, training and updates from a company that has done this for decades. Lapas support is email and chat from the person who built it, which is fast but is not a training department.
- Plasma process depth
Lead-in strategy, cut sequencing and consumable-aware parameters built for plasma specifically. Lapas handles plasma-width kerf and spacing well, but it is a nester, not a plasma CAM package.
How the nesting itself compares
ProNest LT is licensed Windows software with no public build, so it cannot be run headless against a fixed instance set and no honest measured comparison exists. Nobody can show you that, including us. What is published is Lapas Core v1.1 against deepnest-next v1.5.6 across 37 cases, scored by an independent program. Read it as evidence about the Lapas engine, not as a claim about ProNest.
Every number is recomputed from the output geometry by a scorer that is not part of either engine, and the raw JSON and CSV are published under CC BY 4.0 so you can check them or rerun the cases yourself. The ties are in there on purpose.
See the full benchmarkMoving a job from ProNest LT to Lapas
- 1
If you run Hypertherm hardware and use SureCut, do not migrate. You would be giving up the thing you are paying for.
- 2
Where Lapas fits alongside it is quoting and evaluation: nest a prospective job in the browser and get the sheet count before the job is committed to production.
- 3
Export the parts as DXF from the same CAD you already feed ProNest, and upload them.
- 4
Set sheet size and kerf, run the nest, and compare the plate count against what ProNest produces on the same parts.
- 5
Take the DXF into your CAM to post, or use the PDF report for the quote. Both are on the free plan.
Common questions
The entry plan, Smart Start, is $29.99 per month per user according to Hypertherm’s subscription pages in July 2026. All plans come with a 7 day free trial and include support, training and updates. Costs for additional seats are quoted separately.
No, it is a Windows desktop application. That is the most common practical reason shops look for an alternative, along with the absence of a free tier.
Yes, with no credit card and no expiry: 5 new projects a month, unlimited re-nests of any project you have already started, no cap on parts per job, and the full nesting engine rather than a cut-down one. Pro is $49 a month, or $39 a month billed annually.
No. True Hole is part of Hypertherm’s SureCut technology and depends on their plasma source as well as their software. A third-party nesting tool cannot implement it. If bolt-ready holes without secondary operations matter to you, ProNest LT on Hypertherm hardware is the right answer.
Not reliably. Lapas exports the nested layout as DXF for you to post from your existing plasma CAM. G-code export exists but is beta and has not been validated across controllers, so verify it before cutting. Validated machine output is exactly what ProNest LT is for.
Possibly, for quoting rather than production. The free plan costs nothing, runs in a browser away from the CAD workstation, and gives you a sheet count and a PDF report you can price a job from. Keep ProNest for what it is good at.
More comparisons: all alternatives, or start nesting at lapas.io.
Don't take our word for it.
Upload one of your own DXF files and see the layout yourself. It's free and takes about two minutes.
Nest your own file for freeNo credit card · No install · Your files stay yours